|
|
Post by on Sept 21, 2007 5:45:21 GMT -5
I drew my first fur pic. No dragons in this one. =O (most of you have seen this on dA or FA. You can recomment if you wish) piloot.deviantart.com/art/Hey-Everybody-65189498..ok, this is NOT a rape picture. <.=.< Long story short, it's a pic I did for my friend featuring Lavitz (fox) and my form Piwolf (wolf obviously. ). It was a random idea. =P First time actually drawing furs. Ever. And don't scream, I know what you're thinking you perv. It's called anatomy. =| Piwolf (c) Hero Lavitz (c) Amdrag |
|
|
|
Post by red.yoshi on Sept 21, 2007 16:52:11 GMT -5
I call it a bit graphic. Nice though.
edit: A content warning sign could be posted to show forum members who are younger than 17-18 that this is graphic content. Since no sexual organs are showing, I think the rating is...NC-17? Whatever that stands for o,o.
|
|
|
|
Post by Not-Garr on Sept 21, 2007 17:37:50 GMT -5
I call it a bit graphic. Nice though. edit: A content warning sign could be posted to show forum members who are younger than 17-18 that this is graphic content. Since no sexual organs are showing, I think the rating is...NC-17? Whatever that stands for o,o. I don't see how anything graphic is showing. I really, really don't see it. Also: NC-17 stands for No Children Under 17. There is no such thing as NC-18 BTW. I still see no graphic bits. |
|
|
|
Post by red.yoshi on Sept 22, 2007 18:26:10 GMT -5
The concept of the art itself seems a big graphic, especially for children who don't know what sexual intercourse is. Although its not entirely legal, children join this forum who are younger than 12 years of age and lie about their birthday. The content here, in my opinion wouldn't be suitable for young children. A picture like this could lead to a curious or asking child for a more understanding of what is going on in the art which a parent or guardian might not wish to answer at this time. Theres also this rule: 10) Please keep all content G or at most PG13. I won't tolerate any means of vulgarity posted here.I'm not sure if this work of art abides to PG13 content. In my opinion, it certainly does not. I could be wrong, though. |
|
|
|
Post by Not-Garr on Sept 22, 2007 19:20:49 GMT -5
Uhm...what do you even see that's graphic in there? I don't see anything at all.
Would you stop making false accusations in gigantic paragraphs without any explanation or evidence at all?
|
|
|
|
Post by Wildfire the Dragon on Sept 22, 2007 21:56:02 GMT -5
The concept of the art itself seems a big graphic, especially for children who don't know what sexual intercourse is. Although its not entirely legal, children join this forum who are younger than 12 years of age and lie about their birthday. The content here, in my opinion wouldn't be suitable for young children. A picture like this could lead to a curious or asking child for a more understanding of what is going on in the art which a parent or guardian might not wish to answer at this time. Theres also this rule: 10) Please keep all content G or at most PG13. I won't tolerate any means of vulgarity posted here.I'm not sure if this work of art abides to PG13 content. In my opinion, it certainly does not. I could be wrong, though. Dude, it's called anatomy. It's a sheath, Foxes and other Canines have them. Nothing sexual. Just deal with it. |
|
|
|
Post by on Sept 22, 2007 23:24:29 GMT -5
An artist is always criticised for his works. I know why they all turn emo in the end.
Cut off an ear.
Kill art-thieves.
Kill themselves.
...time to draw pictures about little girls in white dresses soaked in blood, ravens with crimson red eyes, and depressed robots who can't hack through their arms with an electric saw.
[failure]
|
|
|
|
Post by Not-Garr on Sept 23, 2007 1:40:49 GMT -5
Dude, it's called anatomy. It's a sheath, Foxes and other Canines have them. Nothing sexual. Just deal with it. There's a sheath in there? What? I didn't even see anything... I think red was just trying to be a hero and an upstart with his usual backseat modding, just ignore him and he'll cut it out eventually. PS: Red, if you see something you think breaks the rules, don't start crap like this, just call a mod. |
|
|
|
Post by Wildfire the Dragon on Sept 23, 2007 12:00:44 GMT -5
Dude, it's called anatomy. It's a sheath, Foxes and other Canines have them. Nothing sexual. Just deal with it. There's a sheath in there? What? I didn't even see anything... You didn't? O.o Well, you'll be surprised what the Furry stuff can teach ya. XD Seriously, I don't know what to say here w/o getting in trouble. LEVEL UP ! !Yeah, Red. Just get over it. Pilot, just ignore him, please don't do that. o.o; Now, we should get back onto topic. I think the picture is nice. Especially for the fact that this is your first time drawing fur related characters. I'm hoping mine will turn out the way yours did, truth be told. Nice Job Pilot. ^^ |
|
|
|
Post by red.yoshi on Sept 23, 2007 13:12:05 GMT -5
In no way was I trying to degrade you or your picture, Pilot. I was just making a suggestion for a more mature audience warning. Aye, sorry I stepped in and gave my two cents.
|
|
|
|
Post by Digi on Sept 23, 2007 19:38:44 GMT -5
Geez, could we not have this happen? =3= If your in doubt, please just ask a mod. And don't go emo on us, please. That comment wasn't exactly necessary. I think the picture's sort of borderline, but it's just anatomy. So.. Neh.
On the actual picture, it's pretty good for a first time drawing furs. d(-o- d) Though, I'd advise using less awkward poses, so these sorts of disputes don't happen. Kay? Kay. Play nice now.
|
|
|
|
Post by on Sept 23, 2007 19:45:56 GMT -5
If you thought that was bad, wait until you see my next picture. o:
Just kidding.
But really.
It's not "awkward poses" as much as it is slightly mature themes. I'm guessing from this little post I could NEVER post pictures of my dog.
[too muture, ya'see?]
Still.
Thanks for the compliments. Another pic is following soon in its place; a far better one. I'll post up a (BEWARE: 13+ PL0X!) warning next time to prevent silly squabbles like this.
|
|
