|
Post by PinkFloydYoshi on Feb 28, 2005 23:04:39 GMT -5
Whoops, sorry! I tried to make you a moderator last night, but there was no "moderator" in the drop-down list and so I assumed "staff member" was the same thing... I also tried to make you a global moderator but it didn't work. So I just left you as staff member. I checked and you're a normal user again? Can you see the whole board now? I am sorry, I was just trying to make you a moderator as you were hoping for. Tim must have done some changes to the board's permissions. In this case only Tim can make you a moderator. A few too many 'sorries' in there, heh. Don't worry about it(I can no-longer count the amount of times I've said that today on one hand...) Yes, I can see the whole board again, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Soul on Feb 28, 2005 23:16:14 GMT -5
I do not have any experience with setting permissions because I don't have access to that feature. Only the main admin can do that...
Oh yes, I remember... However, this doesn't explain why I was unable to make PFY a global moderator. (?)
|
|
|
Post by Not-Garr on Mar 1, 2005 18:09:00 GMT -5
..I think it's because only the god admin can..not sure, it could also be because there can be only one Global Mod? Not sure there either, but is IS one of those things.
|
|
|
Post by Gene L.D. Ryoko on Mar 1, 2005 21:36:06 GMT -5
no blinx used have me,joshi,naru,and a few others as g.mods
|
|
|
Post by PinkFloydYoshi on Mar 1, 2005 22:39:32 GMT -5
..I think it's because only the god admin can..not sure, it could also be because there can be only one Global Mod? Not sure there either, but is IS one of those things. That would explain why soul can't do it. It's a similar system with InvisionBoards. Root Administrator (or member 1) has complete and unrestricted access to the boards features. It's all in the safety of the creators of the board. If a root admin was too trusting in friends for example, they have access to the 'Delete Board' function, but with the system as it is now, we're protected by that. Proboards works the same way as IPB when it comes to permission groups too, 'cept there's more functionality behind IPB. Bleh, I'm blabbing again. I've made my point I think...
|
|