|
|
Post by Teo on Nov 17, 2006 0:02:06 GMT -5
Well lesse... I've seen previews of both systems and my vote goes for the Wii. PS3 is going to have incredible graphics, I've seen a few trailers, and they're going to be amazing. Unfortunately, that's not my style. Lookatme! For someone who's played Runescape 2 years which has horrible graphics and doesn't even mind them, who cares about graphics? Besides, all I ever see for the PS's is a lot of racing and first person shooters, with some good ones like Jak. And that rayman game was kinda fun... Wii just looks plain crazy-neat. Super Smash Brothers Brawl looks wicked... the super smashes are a signature of Nintendo, and frankly, they are good. Plus, imagine all our favorites coming! New Mario Parties, Zelda's, and any other game we can pick up at the store and say "Oh hey, I wanna play that!" Besides, did you guys see that new controller? (Rhetorical question) Nintendo's taking a big chance with this, and I think they really might have come up with something awesome. I don't see how anyone would want any other system unless they love racing and good graphics. We 4 mii! (and no, this poll ISN'T fair... lets post something like this on gametalk or something  ) |
|
|
|
Post by Anjil on Nov 17, 2006 0:31:39 GMT -5
I'm getting a PSWii60.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brute on Nov 17, 2006 0:39:33 GMT -5
All in good time when I have the money, I will indeed get a Wii. XD
|
|
|
|
Post by Max "Snow" Andershi on Nov 17, 2006 5:39:21 GMT -5
And what Lazo said: "599 US dollars." I barely have 200 in my total savings Darn, I forgot to correct him!!! Actually there are two versions of the PS3. The $600 version has 80GB of internal memory. There is also a $400 version, this has 40GB of memory internally. |
|
|
|
Post by Zippy on Nov 17, 2006 6:42:07 GMT -5
Darn, I forgot to correct him!!! Actually there are two versions of the PS3. The $600 version has 80GB of internal memory. There is also a $400 version, this has 40GB of memory internally. Ooops, my mistake. 20GB off with each model. *looks down in dispare* Maybe I should have checked before posting, always in a rush I am. XD But yeah, you, my friend, are correct. *claps* |
|
|
|
Post by Max "Snow" Andershi on Nov 17, 2006 8:31:51 GMT -5
Eh, no worries ^^ I just wanted to make sure that the right information was out there
|
|
|
|
Post by firespikez on Nov 17, 2006 10:29:17 GMT -5
wii... seriously... do you really wanna buy a thing for 600$  go wii! only 300$ like the gamecube when he beginned |
|
|
|
Post by Bry on Nov 17, 2006 10:34:52 GMT -5
Maybe not as clean cut as people might think.
Even though I pre-orderd my Wii over a month ago and have no plans of getting a PS3 in the next year, I wouldn't rule it out all together.
Just because it is launching with little to shout about doesn't mean it will never have some first rate titles.
The Wii I expect to be great fun and a new experience. Though the cheaper console is offset by other expenses, especially controllers. And how practical it actually is to have 4 people playing with the wiimotes at a time.
However, in the long run, I don't really see there being that many stellar games. Once the first 6 months is passed, what then?
We know what the future brings on Xbox 360 and the PS3.
What happens to the Wii once Mario Galaxy, Smash Bros and Metroid are out seems far more vague.
Amazing content, but not a lot of it seems to be the consoles destiny.
|
|
|
|
Post by Moot on Nov 17, 2006 11:15:50 GMT -5
so I finally got my pWiiorder taken care of, so I think its pretty obvious what I'm getting~
Still though, I remember the DS had a fairly lame start, but look at that now. PSP on the other hand, nobody here seems to be bothered about that anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by contention on Nov 17, 2006 16:20:26 GMT -5
Aye, this seems to be a very large question; almost anywhere you go this week. It's posted on every little cliff and put on each inch of space it can take. Asking everyone their opinion on the newest systems coming out. They often wonder, scratching their little gamer heads; you know, the ones without the touch of sunlight. Sitting there, pondering what their greedy hands should pry upon; scanning through limitless articles to breathtaking pictures. Yet, those alone could hardly come to solve the equation that these two new consoles prepare for our growing days. It's more than just difficult to come to some standard choice between the two, but then again that's only based on the quality of the console itself. This isn't torn between the pages of the games, or what they are going to offer in the future. Of course, when gazing onto these two new releases; there is one major diffrence thats easy to spot. That's size, and of course the smallest is always Nintendo. As to why, well easily based on the culture that Japan seems to adore and represent. The Sony, on the other hand, is the largest of the other two next-gen consoles; which is somewhat akward in it's own glance. Yet, size definetly does not matter this time around.
The first thing people look to when they state the "Wii" is that revolutionary controller. They seem to drool over it, wanting to somehow get their hands on such a device. Luckily, this Sunday that prayer will be answered. It's the first of it's kind, although it is not the first motion sensor device ever made. Consoles had tried it in the past, but the Wii will win this simply for a few reasons. They've updated the way it works, they have their sensor bars, and the motion sensor can also work in a numerous amount of ways. So, in the long run; out of any of the others, the Wii captivates because of it's easy to use controller. On the other hand, the PS3, when hearing of this new Wii advantage, decided to copy the price tag. They to have picked up on the relative small amount of motion sensing. However, you really don't get to move around; the games are still button and stick based. Microsoft, of the other two mentioned that they did not want to get into this "motion sensor" battle. Not because they couldn't, but because they admitted their respect for Nintendo and the design that it established.
Now, one thing as Bry was stating, is a very good remark of the sorts. He brought up the essence of the games being released for the systems. Sure, as moot was saying as well; we know that there have been past "consoles" that start off slow and then get quicker. When the Gamecube was released back in the day, there was a lot of hype over it's new set of games. People felt the small size was a "new step", the same with the Wii's controller. And, in essence, the Gamecube was it's own step in gaming. People also believed it would be the leader, and for a short time, it was. They also promised us great games, and for awhile, they kept those demands. Everyone remembers titles such as Super Smash Brothers Melee and Super Mario Sunshine, as well as Mario Kart Double Dash. Now, of course, not all of them were release titles; but they were some of the most popular (And yes, you can count Metroid). Then, after awhile, you start to notice a sour spot. The Gamecube kept releasing games, a lot of third-party ones as well. It got repititive, and old; but people still loved it. That console offered a lot, and could have given so much if it would have accessed more beloved essence. The hope is, that this time around the Wii will give the games that the players want. Starting with the Twilight Princess, and moving on up.
So Bry is right; we know that the Wii is releasing some great games, games that make you all cry and hug yourselves at night. That's really cool, but when those games are up and done; whats next? We don't know, and we didn't with the Gamecube either, and that paid a hefty price. But then again, that controller is enough alone to keep going back; it's better than Jenny Craig.
The Playstation 3, is well, the Playstation 3, and it's games are still coming through with their titles. Of course though, a lot of talk is heading on this "Resistance: Fall of Man", which has a lot to go for with those new snazzy looks. But looks are definetly not everything, though they can at times give a lot of depth and atmosphere. The only issue with many, as already stated, is that the PS3 is so high. The baggage of money is hurtful alone, and on top of that; a recent glitch to disallow older games is going to cause many upstirring voices. Though, no company would let that go; they will most definetly fix that as soon as the chance arrives. Also, on the excitement of their blue-ray; a gaming company once quoted, "Natural Blue Ray players often cost around 900 and above; the PS3 only cost about 600. So, are we getting the same level of a Blue Ray Player as others if we buy the PS3?" That's an interesting thought though, and can only be answered when the PS3 opens up a bit more. Or, Perhaps it has something to do with the packing, sort of like Walmart. If you put a lot of things in one bundle, it's cheaper; so that might play a role.
Also, all in all; you can not leave out the Xbox 360; though already set into the ground; it's still being formed as it should. It has a lot to offer, and is still going strong; so finally, now all the pawns are set to the board, and the games can begin. It's just like four years ago, when we all were wondering what to get. The PS2 (Which was out a year in advance, Hmmm, Deja Vu?), the Xbox, or the Gamecube. Now, this has only grown stronger; and fans seem to be more bickery and violent; it's not that hard of a choice to make, it's just a console. Besides, as many have said, its the games that count in full.
As well, a lot seems to be going into the Online World. If you remember back, far enough; all the consoles tried this at one time. Xbox was the first to take it seriously; though the other two stuck their heads in to see how it was. Finally, they are all taking it to the next addition. The Wii has an interesting userface and it's own browser; I'd like to see what the 360 will do to contrast with that. They are getting some random shipment of big company shows from television, as well as movies; which is something. But still, it would be nice to browse the internet as others are doing. It's a big leap, and they are definetly taking it. It would be nice if everyone could buy all three systems though; and just stop complaining about who is better. Because in the end, when the next consoles come out in say, five or six years; we'll be doing this all over again.
(Also, you should buy a console, because it lets you have fun. You don't buy something because you feel you can say you have a better console. You don't go and buy a Wii and run around commenting that you now have the greatest thing in the world. In your opinion it might be. But then again, it might not be that way to others. You're a fan of what you say you are; that doesn't make it the best. Sure they try to advertise as number one, they all do. But in reality, it's really who you can have fun with. If you love to move when you play games; the Wii is totally you. If you love to shoot, online, and pretty graphics; the 360 is for you. If you love to have some of the greatest graphics, take the PS3. Whichever suits you, but none is better that the other; they are pretty much the same. It just depends on the fact that you enjoy yourself.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Bry on Nov 18, 2006 4:08:02 GMT -5
The Wii doesn't have it as easy as the cube.
When you rethink it, we actually did know what was coming with the Cube.
The 2nd year graced us with Mario Sunshine, StarFox Adventures, Metroid Prime, Zelda: WindWaker.
We even knew what would kick off the third year, Mario Kart.
This time around, the Wii is pushing out more games, more quickly. Launched with Zelda with Smash Bros, Mario Galaxy and Metroid expected in Q1 or Q2 2007.
And then there's almost nothing. This presents the problem.
We know there will not be a new Zelda game in the 2nd year, Nintendo just do not work that fast.
And remember, Twilight Princess is a Gamecube game, end of story. Its a port that uses the Wii controller. It is not a true Wii game.
Based on Nintendo's track record, it is highly unlikely there will be a second Mario, Metroid or Smash Bros game in the 2nd or even 3rd years either.
What does it leave us in the long run?
You cannot truly depend on 3rd party games either.
For multiformat releases, the Wii's more limited hardware cripples it.
Previously in such releases, the Gamecube versions offered distinct advantages. The hardware was inbetween the PS2 and Xbox and the disc format allowed faster loading times.
This time around, the Wii just doesn't have the horsepower to keep up. And while it does have the controller, its uses in such games would always be 'tacked on' rather than an instrumental function of gameplay.
So what do we see with the Wii?
Its the dedicated 3rd party titles that may prove to be its lifeblood.
But lets be serious. How many developers are going to really drop the BIG money and titles on such a console format.
Is the lifeblood of the Wii destined to be full screen and enhanced versions of DS titles like Trauma Theatre, Phoenix Wright, Brain Academy and WarioWare mixed with a string of Virtual Console titles.
This is the crutch of the issue. While a lot of these games are great fun, are they really worth paying full console prices, both hardware and software, over hand held ones?
Would you really be happy playing such games hours on end from your sofa having been robbed of the mobility of the DS.
Is the Wii truly a console that can survive on its own.
Or is this in fact, the first console truly made to complement a second machine.
I have my Xbox 360. With my Wii, it seems there is little I could really miss out on apart from the likes of Metal Gear Solid.
I know quite a few people from completely non-Nintendo related boards who are excited about the Wii.
But it is no exaggeration to say that all of them also intend to get a PS3 or Xbox 360.
|
|
|
|
Post by teh yoshi on Nov 19, 2006 19:16:51 GMT -5
Did someone just say "wiiaboo?"
'Cause I think I just heard someone say "wiiaboo."
WII-A-BOO! WII-A-BOO!
|
|
|
|
Post by Yin on Nov 19, 2006 19:29:53 GMT -5
Wii, most definitely. All the games I want to play are ones only for Nintendo, never the PS, so why should I get the PS3? Although I don't think the people around here would agree with me. There was even a guy in my state that shot a man for the PS3, and if you look on eBay they're selling them for thousands!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rainbow Yoshi on Nov 20, 2006 19:20:28 GMT -5
I want the Wii. Very badly. More than anything. I might not get one though. All the stores that sell them will decide who gets them by doing a raffle drawing. Only the people who get called can buy one. Also, they're having employees of the stores escort you to your car once you buy the Wii for protection.
The Wii has been in my newspaper for the past two days, and even in my school newpaper. But there's not much going on about the ps3 where I live, except for about 5 sentences in a Wii arcticle in my newspaper talking about the guy in Washington who got shot for a ps3.
Yeah, it's gonna be hard to get a Wii for me. However, I won't rest until I get one!
|
|
|
|
Post by Masakuni on Nov 20, 2006 23:51:14 GMT -5
Too obvious, the Wii!
Well, yeah, I'm more loyal to Nintendo than the other video game companies, so of course. Not that I hate Sony or Microsoft or anything really. However, another reason is that Sony is not doing so hot around the states in terms of the PS3 right now...
|
|
|
|
Post by on Nov 21, 2006 14:23:58 GMT -5
Hmmm.. I'm stuck. The Wii is innovative, but how long will that last? Also, its graphics (sorry to say) are limited, like to a Gamecube 1.5 or so. On the other hand, it is very unique and has an intriguing sense of gameplay, though it may get repetitive. Don't get me wrong: I am an avid, hardcore Nintendo gamer, but once you think about it, will the Wii be able to keep up with Nintendo's rep or will the Wii die horribly in sales?
As for the PS3, it has great graphics, but it's like you remade the PS2, nothing new. Well, I guess you can use the old boomerang controller as a form of terrorist weaponry. I have to admit, the graphics are incredible, but will future game's standards keep up? We've seen Gears of War and all those games, but will the PS3 really be worth the cost? No right-minded person should EVER have to pay 600$ for a system, no matter how amazing it is. Although the graphics are better than the Wii's, us Americans want more than a better PS2, we want change.
Wii = ok graphics, awesome games, unique gameplay, and classic characters
PS3 = Great graphics, fun games, and a Cell broadband CPU
I guess I choose the Wii, because price matters. I'd much rather get a cheap system, than an overpriced one. ^^
|
|
|
|
Post by 00Yoshi on Nov 22, 2006 20:04:59 GMT -5
Wii has SSBB, thats makes it kool
|
|
Reaper X5
New Yoshi
A punishment to some, to some a gift, and to many a favor.
Posts: 42
|
Post by Reaper X5 on Nov 22, 2006 21:55:28 GMT -5
wow i dident expect so many nintendo players here
*sniff* im so proud of nintendo
|
|
|
|
Post by dude on Nov 23, 2006 14:56:26 GMT -5
Wii.
PS3 is expensive as hell. And don't have many interesting titles so far. At least not for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Teo on Nov 28, 2006 21:28:30 GMT -5
Ha... get this, they only released 400,000 PS3's in the US. They were being sold for $2k on Ebay. Some people even bought them uniquely to sell on Ebay!
Nintendo is being much more reasonable, but with a 50% less console, they have to be able to sell double of them before they get near what's being made for the PS3.
Why are people so into GRAPHICS?? Maybe it's the idea that you'd have to get used to a new controlled that shooes people away. Aw well, we'll just have to wait and see.
|
|
